Gigi Stok - Italian composer. Article "Gigi Stok" in Italian Wikipedia has 12.7 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 0 references and 12 sections. The article also contains quality flaw template, which reduce quality score.
Since the creation of article "Gigi Stok", its content was written by 31 registered users of Italian Wikipedia and edited by 31 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 27 times in Italian Wikipedia and cited 27 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Italian: #116227 12.2012 |
Global: #1795382 12.2012 |
| Best Rank | Italian: #10231 11.2008 |
Global: #340316 11.2008 |
On 16 May 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Yasuke, New Caledonia, Slovakia, Robert Fico, Bridgerton, YouTube, ChatGPT, deaths in 2024, Planet of the Apes, May 16.
In Italian Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Bridgerton, Massimiliano Allegri, Albo d'oro della Coppa Italia, Prey (film 2022), Robert Fico, Juventus Football Club, Coppa Italia, Gabriele Rubini, Nuova Caledonia, Tutto per mio figlio.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(9.2+0+5.26+52.17+0)-0.67$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
